<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"><identifier identifierType="DOI">10.7910/DVN/XKBYDG</identifier><creators><creator><creatorName nameType="Organizational">International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)</creatorName></creator></creators><titles><title>Nature+ Quantitative Monitoring Household Survey, Colombia</title></titles><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><publicationYear>2025</publicationYear><subjects><subject>Agricultural Sciences</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_40cb9134" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">agrifood systems</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">sustainable agriculture</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">natural resources management</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34823" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">land degradation</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10967" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">food security</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">COLOMBIA</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7253" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">SOUTH AMERICA</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_dd6a2441" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN</subject><subject valueURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_335" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">AMERICAS</subject><subject schemeURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2ac7c9e1" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">Agricultural production</subject><subject schemeURI="http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115" subjectScheme="AGROVOC">Natural resources management</subject></subjects><contributors><contributor contributorType="ContactPerson"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">IFPRI-Data</contributorName><affiliation>International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)</affiliation></contributor><contributor contributorType="Producer"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="ProjectLeader"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">Azzarri, Carlo (International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI))</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Researcher"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">Lopera, Diana Carolina (Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT)</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Researcher"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Murgueitio, Carolina (Econometria)</contributorName><givenName>Carolina (Econometria)</givenName><familyName>Murgueitio</familyName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Researcher"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Urrea, Zuleima (Econometria)</contributorName><givenName>Zuleima (Econometria)</givenName><familyName>Urrea</familyName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Researcher"><contributorName>AGROSAVIA</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Researcher"><contributorName>Naturamazonas</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Other"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">Innovation Policy and Scaling Unit</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Other"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">CGIAR Initiative on Nature-Positive Solutions</contributorName></contributor><contributor contributorType="Distributor"><contributorName nameType="Organizational">International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)</contributorName></contributor></contributors><dates><date dateType="Issued">2025</date><date dateType="Created">2024-02-26</date><date dateType="Submitted">2025-04</date><date dateType="Updated">2025-06-23</date><date dateType="Collected">2024-02-11/2024-02-26</date></dates><resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">sample survey data (SSD)</resourceType><relatedIdentifiers><relatedIdentifier relationType="IsCitedBy" relatedIdentifierType="Handle">10568/172753</relatedIdentifier></relatedIdentifiers><sizes><size>1797235</size><size>418837</size><size>1579559</size><size>80295</size><size>659</size><size>596</size><size>2761</size><size>66085</size><size>6190</size><size>3081</size><size>7293</size><size>180422</size><size>4736</size><size>14742</size><size>12322</size><size>147132</size><size>45532</size><size>1919748</size><size>16704</size><size>103260</size><size>6866</size><size>280671</size><size>4822</size><size>226781</size><size>2720</size><size>26152</size><size>2040</size><size>34864</size><size>1332</size><size>25752</size><size>1766</size><size>66325</size><size>2170</size><size>111906</size><size>4334</size><size>59643</size></sizes><formats><format>application/pdf</format><format>application/pdf</format><format>application/pdf</format><format>application/pdf</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format></formats><version>1.0</version><rightsList><rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"/><rights/></rightsList><descriptions><description descriptionType="Abstract">The NATURE+ survey conducted in Colombia integrated household and community-level questionnaires to develop a comprehensive understanding of the socio-economic, agricultural, and environmental dynamics influencing potential beneficiaries of NATURE+ interventions. The study focused on two key departments: Nariño and Putumayo. &lt;/p>

At the household level, the survey collected detailed socio-economic and demographic data, including household composition, education levels, land ownership, income sources, self-employment activities, and asset ownership. This information provides crucial insights into the economic conditions of the surveyed population. The survey also documented agricultural practices on farms and in chagras—traditional agroforestry systems maintained by Indigenous communities. Specific attention was given to crop and livestock production, crop biodiversity, and the use of fertilizers and pesticides. &lt;/p>

The survey further investigated the adoption of nature-positive solutions, including agroforestry practices, environmental management (such as waste handling and renewable energy use), and awareness of biodiversity benefits. Issues related to food security and dietary diversity were also addressed. &lt;/p>

At the community level, the questionnaire aimed to capture broader socio-economic, environmental, and institutional factors across selected communities in Cumbal (Nariño) and multiple municipalities in Putumayo. It gathered demographic estimates—such as population size, gender and age composition, and number of households—to construct a socio-economic profile of each community. The survey assessed the prevalence and benefits of nature-positive practices, such as biodiversity conservation, agroforestry, and sustainable land management. It also evaluated the role of external actors, including NGOs and extension agencies, in promoting these practices. Additional components covered community infrastructure, natural resource governance, and ongoing sustainability initiatives.</description></descriptions><geoLocations><geoLocation><geoLocationPlace>Washington, DC</geoLocationPlace></geoLocation></geoLocations><fundingReferences><fundingReference><funderName>CGIAR Trust Fund</funderName></fundingReference></fundingReferences></resource>