<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"><identifier identifierType="DOI">10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS</identifier><creators><creator><creatorName nameType="Personal">HAZLETT, CHAD</creatorName><givenName>CHAD</givenName><familyName>HAZLETT</familyName><nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID">0000-0003-1819-1928</nameIdentifier><affiliation>University of California, Los Angeles</affiliation></creator></creators><titles><title>Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas</title></titles><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><publicationYear>2020</publicationYear><subjects><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>climate, wildfire, environment, sensitivity analysis</subject></subjects><contributors><contributor contributorType="ContactPerson"><contributorName nameType="Personal">HAZLETT, CHAD</contributorName><givenName>CHAD</givenName><familyName>HAZLETT</familyName><affiliation>University of California, Los Angeles</affiliation></contributor></contributors><dates><date dateType="Submitted">2020-05-23</date><date dateType="Updated">2020-07-16</date></dates><resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset"/><relatedIdentifiers><relatedIdentifier relationType="IsCitedBy" SchemeURI="https://doi.org/" relatedIdentifierType="DOI">10.1017/S0003055420000441</relatedIdentifier></relatedIdentifiers><sizes><size>148315906</size></sizes><formats><format>application/zip</format></formats><version>1.0</version><rightsList><rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"/><rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</rights></rightsList><descriptions><description descriptionType="Abstract">One political barrier to climate reforms is the temporal mismatch between short-term policy costs and long-term policy benefits. Will public support for climate reforms increase as climate-related disasters make the short-term costs of inaction more salient? Leveraging variation in the timing of Californian wildfires, we evaluate how exposureto a climate-related hazard influences political behavior, rather than self-reported attitudes or behavioral intentions. We show that wildfires increased support for costly, climate-related ballot measures by 5 to 6 percentage points for those living within 5km of a recent wildfire, decaying to near zero beyond a distance of 15km. This effect is concentrated in Democratic-voting areas, and nearly zero in Republican-dominated areas. We conclude that experienced climate threats can enhance willingness-to-act but largely in places where voters are known to believe in climate change.</description></descriptions><geoLocations/></resource>