<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"><identifier identifierType="DOI">10.7910/DVN/KU4OCK</identifier><creators><creator><creatorName nameType="Personal">Barber, Michael</creatorName><givenName>Michael</givenName><familyName>Barber</familyName><nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID">0000-0002-1576-2839</nameIdentifier><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></creator><creator><creatorName nameType="Personal">Dynes, Adam M.</creatorName><givenName>Adam M.</givenName><familyName>Dynes</familyName><nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID">0000-0002-9153-5726</nameIdentifier><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></creator></creators><titles><title>Replication Data for: City-State Ideological Incongruence and Municipal Preemption</title></titles><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><publicationYear>2021</publicationYear><subjects><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Preemption</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Intergovernmental politics</subject><subject>State politics</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>Elite survey</subject></subjects><contributors><contributor contributorType="ContactPerson"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Barber, Michael</contributorName><givenName>Michael</givenName><familyName>Barber</familyName><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></contributor><contributor contributorType="ContactPerson"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Dynes, Adam M.</contributorName><givenName>Adam M.</givenName><familyName>Dynes</familyName><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></contributor><contributor contributorType="Producer"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Barber, Michael</contributorName><givenName>Michael</givenName><familyName>Barber</familyName><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></contributor><contributor contributorType="Producer"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Dynes, Adam M.</contributorName><givenName>Adam M.</givenName><familyName>Dynes</familyName><affiliation>Brigham Young University</affiliation></contributor></contributors><dates><date dateType="Submitted">2021-04-16</date><date dateType="Updated">2023-04-26</date></dates><resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset"/><relatedIdentifiers><relatedIdentifier relationType="IsCitedBy" relatedIdentifierType="DOI">10.1111/ajps.12655</relatedIdentifier></relatedIdentifiers><sizes><size>5935074</size><size>15381788</size><size>184191</size><size>5918</size><size>54407</size><size>42931</size></sizes><formats><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>text/tab-separated-values</format><format>application/pdf</format><format>text/plain</format><format>application/x-stata-syntax</format><format>type/x-r-syntax</format></formats><version>1.1</version><rightsList><rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"/><rights/></rightsList><descriptions><description descriptionType="Abstract">A growing concern among municipal officials across the U.S. is that their policymaking capacity is under attack by state legislatures who are increasingly likely to preempt those municipalities. However, determining the extent to which municipalities are preempted is challenging. We overcome this by surveying a large sample of municipal officials from across the U.S. We find that officials from municipalities that are more ideologically distant from their state overall are more likely to report being preempted by their state government. Moreover, this pattern is driven by more liberal municipalities in both Republican and Democratic states reporting higher rates of preemption. Additionally, municipalities under unified state governments are more likely to report preemption, especially those under unified Republican control. These findings have important implications for the quality of representation in our federalist system and indicate that preemption is not just an issue between Republican states and liberal urban cities.</description><description descriptionType="Other">This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 
&lt;br>&lt;/br>
Note: To maintain the confidentiality of the participants, the authors cannot share the original data set. The authors shared the original data with Odum Institute for verification 
 purposes. In  Dataverse, they have posted a version of the data set with added noise to protect the confidentiality of the respondents. See the readme for more information. To access a version of the dataset without added noise, please contact the authors. 
&lt;br>&lt;/br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials Badge. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the &lt;a href="https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki/home/" target="_blank">Center for Open Science&lt;/a>.&lt;br>&lt;/br>
&lt;img src="https://odum.unc.edu/files/2020/03/OpenMaterials_PR-1.png" alt="Open Materials Badge" height="77" width="80"></description></descriptions><geoLocations/></resource>