<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"><identifier identifierType="DOI">10.7910/DVN/BBS0SH</identifier><creators><creator><creatorName nameType="Personal">Gray-Lobe, Guthrie</creatorName><givenName>Guthrie</givenName><familyName>Gray-Lobe</familyName><nameIdentifier SchemeURI="https://orcid.org/" nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID">0000-0002-5276-5860</nameIdentifier><affiliation>University of Chicago</affiliation></creator></creators><titles><title>A Year of Desirable Difficulties: The Impact of Interleaving Math Practice in Nigeria</title></titles><publisher>Harvard Dataverse</publisher><publicationYear>2026</publicationYear><subjects><subject>Social Sciences</subject></subjects><contributors><contributor contributorType="ContactPerson"><contributorName nameType="Personal">Gray-Lobe, Guthrie</contributorName><givenName>Guthrie</givenName><familyName>Gray-Lobe</familyName><affiliation>University of Chicago</affiliation></contributor></contributors><dates><date dateType="Submitted">2026-03-23</date><date dateType="Updated">2026-03-31</date></dates><resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset"/><relatedIdentifiers><relatedIdentifier relationType="IsSupplementTo" relatedIdentifierType="URL">https://www.nber.org/papers/w31853</relatedIdentifier></relatedIdentifiers><sizes><size>1052760</size></sizes><formats><format>application/zip</format></formats><version>1.0</version><rightsList><rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"/><rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</rights></rightsList><descriptions><description descriptionType="Abstract">This paper tests whether increasing students’ exposure to “desirable difficulties” improves learning in real classrooms. In a year-long field experiment in Nigerian primary schools, interleaved math practice raised short-term test performance by 0.28 standard deviations but had no effect on cumulative end-of-year assessments. Gains were concentrated among lower-achieving students, while higher-achieving students saw little or no benefit. The results suggest that strategies that make learning more effortful can boost short-term mastery but may not produce durable improvements, highlighting the limits of applying laboratory-based cognitive interventions at scale.</description><description descriptionType="Other">The data are anonymized.</description></descriptions><geoLocations/></resource>