Replication Data for: Exploring Disagreement in Indicators of State Repression (doi:10.7910/DVN/V5LB9K)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Exploring Disagreement in Indicators of State Repression

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/V5LB9K

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Date of Distribution:

2018-05-30

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Crabtree, Charles, 2018, "Replication Data for: Exploring Disagreement in Indicators of State Repression", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V5LB9K, Harvard Dataverse, V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Replication Data for: Exploring Disagreement in Indicators of State Repression

Identification Number:

doi:10.7910/DVN/V5LB9K

Authoring Entity:

Crabtree, Charles (University of Michigan)

Producer:

Crabtree, Charles

Distributor:

Harvard Dataverse

Access Authority:

Crabtree, Charles

Depositor:

Crabtree, Charles

Date of Deposit:

2018-05-27

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V5LB9K

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, human rights, repression, measurement

Abstract:

Until recently, researchers who wanted to examine the determinants of state respect for most specific negative rights needed to rely on data from the CIRI or the Political Terror Scale (PTS). The new V-DEM dataset offers scholars a potential alternative to the individual human rights variables from CIRI. We analyze a set of key Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project and Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM) negative rights indicators, finding unusual and unexpectedly large patterns of disagreement between the two sets. First, we discuss the new V-DEM dataset by comparing it to the disaggregated CIRI indicators, discussing the history of each project, and describing its empirical domain. Second, we identify a set of disaggregated human rights measures that are similar across the two datasets and discuss each project's measurement approach. Third, we examine how these measures compare to each other empirically, showing that they diverge considerably across both time and space. These findings point to several important directions for future work, such as how conceptual approaches and measurement strategies affect rights scores. For the time being, our findings suggest that researchers should think carefully about using the measures as substitutes.

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Notes:

<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>

Other Study Description Materials

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

assn_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

copecrabtreefariss.csv

Notes:

text/csv

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

copecrabtreefariss.r

Notes:

text/x-r-source

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

countrycor.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

dm_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

fm_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

kill_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

religion_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

results.txt

Notes:

text/plain

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

torture_ctry.png

Notes:

image/png

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

yearcor.png

Notes:

image/png