|
View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
|
Citation |
|
|---|---|
|
Title: |
Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2020-07-16 |
|
Version: |
1 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
HAZLETT, CHAD, 2020, "Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS, Harvard Dataverse, V1 |
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS |
|
Authoring Entity: |
HAZLETT, CHAD (University of California, Los Angeles) |
|
Distributor: |
Harvard Dataverse |
|
Access Authority: |
HAZLETT, CHAD |
|
Depositor: |
HAZLETT, CHAD |
|
Date of Deposit: |
2020-05-23 |
|
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS |
|
Study Scope |
|
|
Keywords: |
Social Sciences, climate, wildfire, environment, sensitivity analysis |
|
Abstract: |
One political barrier to climate reforms is the temporal mismatch between short-term policy costs and long-term policy benefits. Will public support for climate reforms increase as climate-related disasters make the short-term costs of inaction more salient? Leveraging variation in the timing of Californian wildfires, we evaluate how exposureto a climate-related hazard influences political behavior, rather than self-reported attitudes or behavioral intentions. We show that wildfires increased support for costly, climate-related ballot measures by 5 to 6 percentage points for those living within 5km of a recent wildfire, decaying to near zero beyond a distance of 15km. This effect is concentrated in Democratic-voting areas, and nearly zero in Republican-dominated areas. We conclude that experienced climate threats can enhance willingness-to-act but largely in places where voters are known to believe in climate change. |
|
Methodology and Processing |
|
|
Sources Statement |
|
|
Data Access |
|
|
Notes: |
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a> |
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
|
Related Publications |
|
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
HAZLETT, C., & MILDENBERGER, M. (2020). Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas. American Political Science Review, 1-7. |
|
Identification Number: |
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000441 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
HAZLETT, C., & MILDENBERGER, M. (2020). Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas. American Political Science Review, 1-7. |
|
Label: |
replication.zip |
|
Notes: |
application/zip |