<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><codeBook xmlns="ddi:codebook:2_5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:codebook:2_5 https://ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd" version="2.5"><docDscr><citation><titlStmt><titl>Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas</titl><IDNo agency="DOI">doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS</IDNo></titlStmt><distStmt><distrbtr source="archive">Harvard Dataverse</distrbtr><distDate>2020-07-16</distDate></distStmt><verStmt source="archive"><version date="2020-07-16" type="RELEASED">1</version></verStmt><biblCit>HAZLETT, CHAD, 2020, "Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS, Harvard Dataverse, V1</biblCit></citation></docDscr><stdyDscr><citation><titlStmt><titl>Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas</titl><IDNo agency="DOI">doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS</IDNo></titlStmt><rspStmt><AuthEnty affiliation="University of California, Los Angeles">HAZLETT, CHAD</AuthEnty></rspStmt><prodStmt/><distStmt><distrbtr source="archive">Harvard Dataverse</distrbtr><contact affiliation="University of California, Los Angeles" email="chazlett@ucla.edu">HAZLETT, CHAD</contact><depositr>HAZLETT, CHAD</depositr><depDate>2020-05-23</depDate></distStmt><holdings URI="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS"/></citation><stdyInfo><subject><keyword xml:lang="en">Social Sciences</keyword><keyword>climate, wildfire, environment, sensitivity analysis</keyword></subject><abstract date="2020-05-22">One political barrier to climate reforms is the temporal mismatch between short-term policy costs and long-term policy benefits. Will public support for climate reforms increase as climate-related disasters make the short-term costs of inaction more salient? Leveraging variation in the timing of Californian wildfires, we evaluate how exposureto a climate-related hazard influences political behavior, rather than self-reported attitudes or behavioral intentions. We show that wildfires increased support for costly, climate-related ballot measures by 5 to 6 percentage points for those living within 5km of a recent wildfire, decaying to near zero beyond a distance of 15km. This effect is concentrated in Democratic-voting areas, and nearly zero in Republican-dominated areas. We conclude that experienced climate threats can enhance willingness-to-act but largely in places where voters are known to believe in climate change.</abstract><sumDscr/></stdyInfo><method><dataColl><sources/></dataColl><anlyInfo/></method><dataAccs><setAvail/><useStmt/><notes type="DVN:TOU" level="dv">&lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0&lt;/a></notes></dataAccs><othrStdyMat><relPubl><citation><titlStmt><titl>HAZLETT, C., &amp; MILDENBERGER, M. (2020). Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas. American Political Science Review, 1-7.</titl><IDNo agency="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000441</IDNo></titlStmt><biblCit>HAZLETT, C., &amp; MILDENBERGER, M. (2020). Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas. American Political Science Review, 1-7.</biblCit></citation><ExtLink URI="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000441"/></relPubl></othrStdyMat></stdyDscr><otherMat ID="f3844555" URI="https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/3844555" level="datafile"><labl>replication.zip</labl><notes level="file" type="DATAVERSE:CONTENTTYPE" subject="Content/MIME Type">application/zip</notes></otherMat></codeBook>