Impact of Fault-Normal Stiffness on Frictional Slip Instability in Induced Seismicitydoi:10.7910/DVN/FO6IC8Harvard Dataverse2026-03-133Sun, Zihan, 2026, "Impact of Fault-Normal Stiffness on Frictional Slip Instability in Induced Seismicity", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FO6IC8, Harvard Dataverse, V3Impact of Fault-Normal Stiffness on Frictional Slip Instability in Induced Seismicitydoi:10.7910/DVN/FO6IC8Sun, ZihanHarvard DataverseSun, ZihanSun, Zihan2026-03-11Earth and Environmental SciencesEngineeringMathematical SciencesData and simulation results for the numerical models of "Impact of Fault-Normal Stiffness on Frictional Slip Instability in Induced Seismicity".<a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0">CC0 1.0</a>Figure 10. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution under three different well shut-in scenarios.xlsxFigure 10. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution under three different well shut-in scenarios. (a) Injected volume and injection rate during the shut-in period. (b) Evolution of fault critical stiffness. (c) Evolution of the fault normal stiffness component.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 11. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution for different fault locations.xlsxFigure 11. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution for different fault locations. (a) Evolution of fault critical stiffness. (b) Evolution of the fault normal stiffness component.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 12. Evolution of fault critical stiffness incorporating the effect of the intermediate principal stress.xlsxFigure 12. Evolution of fault critical stiffness incorporating the effect of the intermediate principal stress. (a) Influence of the intermediate principal stress on fault normal stiffness. (b) Evolution of fault critical stiffness and its normal stiffness component.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 13. Evolution of fault critical stiffness under the influence of different fault aperture parameters.xlsxFigure 13. Evolution of fault critical stiffness under the influence of different fault aperture parameters. (a) Evolution of permeability of the fault. (b) Evolution of fault critical stiffness and its normal stiffness component.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 4. Evolution of Coulomb stress within the fault core during fluid injection.xlsxFigure 4. Evolution of Coulomb stress within the fault core during fluid injection. (a) Evolution of normal stress, pore pressure, effective stress, and the rate of effective stress change in the fault core. (b) Variation of shear stress, peak shear strength, and the difference between them in the fault.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 5. Components that affect the evolution of critical stiffness in response to fluid injection, including effective stress magnitude, r.xlsxFigure 5. Components that affect the evolution of critical stiffness in response to fluid injection, including effective stress magnitudeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 6. Comparison of fault critical stiffness under different conditions.xlsxFigure 6. Comparison of fault critical stiffness under different conditions. application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 7. Laboratory injection induced fault slip data, calculated critical stiffnesses and fault-normal stiffness components configuration.xlsxFigure 7. Laboratory injection induced fault slip data, calculated critical stiffnesses and fault-normal stiffness components configuration.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure 9. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution under four different production strategies.xlsxFigure 9. Comparison of fault critical stiffness evolution under four different production strategies.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure S1. Evolution of frictional parameters.xlsxFigure S1. Evolution of frictional parameters (a) a, (b) b, and (c) d_c from four different shear stiffness conditions in Eijsink's experiments based on the Slip-law. The analysis of the evolution of frictional parameters demonstrates that varying normal stiffness significantly affects these frictional parameters.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure S2. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for different production strategies.xlsxFigure S2. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for different production strategiesapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure S3. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for three different well shut-in strategie.xlsxFigure S3. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for three different well shut-in strategies.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetFigure S4. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for three different fault locations..xlsxFigure S4. Evolution of the difference between shear stress and peak shear strength of fault core for three different fault locations.application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetNumerical models and codes.docxThe numerical models and codes of "Impact of Fault-Normal Stiffness on Frictional Slip Instability in Induced Seismicity"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document