Replication Data for: Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracieshttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/T21M2MGandhi, JenniferOng, ElvinHarvard Dataverse2019-05-162019-11-26T09:53:33ZIn electoral autocracies, opposition coalition formation offers the best hope of getting to democracy. Yet forming electoral coalitions also entails convincing opposition voters to ignore compromises and engage in the cross-party voting necessary for opposition victory. To what extent are voters committed to defeating the autocratic incumbent even if it would result in dislikeable outcomes? A survey experiment in Malaysia finds that opposition voters overwhelmingly express pre-treatment support for the opposition coalition. But when exposed to a treatment vignette about which member party might lead the next government, many voters retract their support. Specifically, voters’ support for the coalition declines when their least preferred member is expected to control the government and when they can vote for a closer ideological alternative outside of the coalition. While voters are committed to opposition unity and democratic transition, that commitment is sensitive to the anticipated consequences of an opposition victory.Social SciencesOpposition cooperationPre-electoral coalitionsElectoral authoritarianismSoutheast AsiaGandhi, Jennifer, and Elvin Ong. 2019. “Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracies.” <i>American Journal of Political Science</i> 63 (4): 948–63., doi, 10.1111/ajps.12441, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.124412019-05-16Ong, Elvin2019-03-02Merdeka Center for Opinion Research. Asian Barometer Survey Wave 4 (Malaysia), 2014-2016. Hu Fu Center for East Asia Democratic Studies, National Taiwan University [distributor]. http://www.asianbarometer.org/survey/wave4-malaysiaMalaysiaThis dataset is made available with limited information on how it can be used. You may wish to communicate with the Contact(s) specified before use.