<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Replication Data for: Greenwashing and Public Demand for Government Regulation</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HOT20S</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>Kolcava, Dennis</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>Harvard Dataverse</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2022-08-30</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2022-08-30T16:57:17Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>These files replicate the analysis in Kolcava, D (forthcoming), Greenwashing and Public Demand for Government Regulation, Journal of Public Policy

Environmental governance in many high-income democracies relies to some extent
on self-regulation by the private sector. Yet, this policy mode is contested and proponents of top-down government regulation argue that voluntary corporate
sustainability commitments remain shallow and rarely are more than greenwashing.
I assess to what extent firms’ business conduct is subject to societal checks and
balances, in particular, whether public support for regulation constitutes a control
mechanism of corporate contributions to environmental goods. I rely on an original
survey experiment (N=2112) conducted with a representative sample of the Swiss
voting population. The analysis shows that accusing firms of greenwashing reduces
both citizens’ perceived effectiveness of self-regulation and perceived synergy of corporate profits and environmental protection. However, this attitudinal shift only
translates into modest updates in respondents’ policy preference formation. As a result, short-run shifts in public support for regulation are an unlikely societal control
mechanism of business conduct.</dcterms:description><dcterms:subject>Social Sciences</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Environmental Politics</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Regulation</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Survey Experiment</dcterms:subject><dcterms:contributor>Kolcava, Dennis</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2022-08-18</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:license>CC0 1.0</dcterms:license></metadata>