<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Replication Data for: Automated Quality Assessment for LLM-Based Complex Qualitative Coding: A Confidence-Diversity Framework</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GM8T8Q</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>zhao, zhilong</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>Harvard Dataverse</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2025-08-26</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2025-08-28T01:38:22Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>This replication package contains all code and data necessary to reproduce the results presented in "Cross-Domain Quality Assessment for Complex Qualitative Analysis: Validating Confidence-Entropy Signals Across Legal, Political, and Medical Tasks".

Research Context: This study extends beyond accessible coding tasks to validate automated quality assessment for complex qualitative analysis requiring domain expertise and interpretive judgment across legal, political, and medical domains.

Package Contents:
- Core Scripts: reproduce_all_results.py (main reproduction script), generate_synthetic_data.py (data generator), validate_reproduction.py (result validation)
- Data Files: Synthetic datasets matching paper statistics for SCOTUS legal reasoning (390 cases), Hyperpartisan political analysis (644 cases), and MTSamples medical classification (1,000 cases)
- Expected Outputs: All LaTeX tables (Table 1-5), validation reports, and cross-domain statistical analyses

Key Findings Reproduced:
- Cross-domain signal effectiveness (Table 1): Perfect correlation reproduction across all domains (±0.005 accuracy)
- Dual-signal weight optimization (Table 2): 6.6-113.7% improvements over single-signal baselines
- Cross-domain transferability (Table 3): 88.9% success rate for weight transfer across domains
- Intelligent triage efficiency (Table 5): 45.4% vs 44.6% effort reduction (0.8% difference)
- Domain-specific patterns: Confidence signals are stronger in legal contexts, and entropy signals are more reliable in political/medical domains

Validation Status: Successfully reproduces all core findings with statistical significance maintained across complex analytical tasks. Demonstrates automated quality assessment viability for scaling complex qualitative research beyond accessible coding tasks.

Usage: Run ./run_complete_reproduction.sh for complete reproduction, or python3 reproduce_all_results.py for individual table generation. All dependencies included.</dcterms:description><dcterms:subject>Computer and Information Science</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Social Sciences</dcterms:subject><dcterms:date>2025-08-26</dcterms:date><dcterms:contributor>zhao, zhilong</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2025-08-26</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:license>CC0 1.0</dcterms:license></metadata>