<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Replication data for: Testing Contest Theory: Evidence from Best-of-Three Tennis Matches</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9AVJ61</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>Andrew Yates</dcterms:creator><dcterms:creator>David Malueg</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>Harvard Dataverse</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2011-01-14</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2011-01-14T11:11:39Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>N/A</dcterms:description><dcterms:isReferencedBy>Malueg, David A., and Yates, Andrew J., (2010) "Testing Contest Theory: Evidence from Best-of-Three Tennis Matches." Review of Economics and Statistics  92:3, 689–692.</dcterms:isReferencedBy><dcterms:date>2011-01-14</dcterms:date><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2010-11-24</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:license>CC0 1.0</dcterms:license></metadata>