<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Replication Data for: Right and left, partisanship predicts vulnerability to misinformation</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6CZHH5</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>Dimitar Nikolov</dcterms:creator><dcterms:creator>Alessandro Flammini</dcterms:creator><dcterms:creator>Filippo Menczer</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>Harvard Dataverse</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2020-10-07</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2021-08-12T11:11:53Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>&lt;p>The dataset consists of two files:&lt;/p>

&lt;p>1. &lt;em>anonymized_shares.json&lt;/em>: A collection of sharing actions, each  corresponding to a tweet posted in June 2017 in which one or more URLs were shared. The format is as follows:&lt;/p>

&lt;p>
&lt;pre>
{
    uid1: [
        {"domains": ["domain1", "domain2"]},
        {"domains": ["domain3"], "retweeted": retweeted_uid},
        {"domains": ["domain4"], "quoted": quoted_uid},
        ...
    ],
    uid2: [
        ...
    ],
    ...
}
&lt;/pre>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
That is, for each sharing action we have:
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;ul>
    &lt;li>the list of domains from which links were shared&lt;/li>
    &lt;li>if the tweet was a retweet, the ID of the user who created the original tweet&lt;/li>
    &lt;li>if the tweet was quoting another tweet, the ID of the user who is being quoted&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
All user IDs were anonymized and will not be traceable to Twitter user IDs.
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
The tweets were collected from the &lt;a href="https://osome.iu.edu/tools/">Social Media Observatory at Indiana University&lt;/a>.
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
2. &lt;em>anonymized_friends.json&lt;/em>: For each user in the dataset, the list of their friends (followees) as given by the &lt;a href="https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/v1/accounts-and-users/follow-search-get-users/api-reference/get-friends-ids">friends/ids Twitter API endpoint&lt;/a>.
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
The format is as follows:
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;pre>
{
    uid1: [friend_uid1, friend_uid2, ...],
    uid2: [...],
    ...
}
&lt;/pre>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>3. &lt;em>measures.tab&lt;/em>: TAB-separated file with partisanship and misinformation scores for each anonymized user.
&lt;p>
All user IDs were anonymized and will not be traceable to Twitter user IDs.
&lt;/p></dcterms:description><dcterms:subject>Computer and Information Science</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Social Sciences</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Misinformation</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Echo Chambers</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Bias</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Polarization</dcterms:subject><dcterms:isReferencedBy>Dimitar Nikolov, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer; Right and left, partisanship predicts vulnerability to misinformation; 2021, arXiv, 2010.01462, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01462</dcterms:isReferencedBy><dcterms:date>2020-10-07</dcterms:date><dcterms:contributor>Nikolov, Dimitar</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2021-01-11</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:source>Observatory on Social Media, https://osome.iu.edu/tools/</dcterms:source><dcterms:source>Twitter, https://developer.twitter.com/</dcterms:source><dcterms:license>CC0 1.0</dcterms:license></metadata>