<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns="http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/"><dcterms:title>Fertilizer Placement Affects Weed Growth and Grain Yield in Dry-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Systems</dcterms:title><dcterms:identifier>https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/24109</dcterms:identifier><dcterms:creator>Chauhan, Bhagirath</dcterms:creator><dcterms:creator>Abugho, Seth</dcterms:creator><dcterms:publisher>Harvard Dataverse</dcterms:publisher><dcterms:issued>2014-01-06</dcterms:issued><dcterms:modified>2015-08-20T04:58:43Z</dcterms:modified><dcterms:description>A study was conducted in a split-plot design to evaluate the effect of fertilizer placement method on weed growth and grain yield in a dry-seeded rice (DSR) system. Main-plot treatments were four fertilizer placement methods: between narrow rows (between 15-cm-wide rows of the pattern 25-15-25 cm), between uniform rows (between 20-cm-wide rows), within uniform rows, and surface broadcast. Subplot treatments were three weed control methods: herbicide-treated, nontreated, and weed-free. Weed biomass was greater in the nontreated plots than in the herbicide-treated plots. Herbicide application reduced weed biomass by 89% to 99% compared with the nontreated control. Fertilizer placement did not influence weed biomass in the herbicide-treated plots; however, it greatly influenced biomass in the nontreated plots. Fertilizer placement on the surface increased weed biomass (69 - 71 g/m2) compared with the placement of fertilizer below the soil surface (37 - 57 g/m2). Fertilizer placement did not influence weed density and bio- mass at 60 days after planting. Nontreated plots yielded 700 to 2080 kg/ha. Grain yield was similar between the herbicide-treated (2660 - 3250 kg/ha) and weed-free (2620 - 3430 kg/ha) plots. Grain yield was not influenced when basal fertilizer was banded within (2390 - 2500 kg/ha) or between rows (2530 - 2650 kg/ha). However, grain yield decreased when basal fertilizer was broadcast on the soil surface (2200 kg/ha). The results of our study demonstrated that rice yield was usually lower with surface broadcast of fertilizer&#xd;
than with subsurface fertilizer treatments. In conclusion, surface broadcast of basal fertilizer may result in high weed pressure in DSR systems.</dcterms:description><dcterms:subject>Earth and Environmental Sciences</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Nitrogen</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Fertilizer</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Weed Biomass</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Weed Density</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Placement</dcterms:subject><dcterms:subject>Asia</dcterms:subject><dcterms:date>2012</dcterms:date><dcterms:contributor>Jean Sabado</dcterms:contributor><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2014-01-03</dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:temporal>2012-01</dcterms:temporal><dcterms:temporal>2012-09</dcterms:temporal><dcterms:relation>K. Ampong-Nyarko and S. K. De Datta, "A Handbook for Weed Control in Rice," International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, 1991, p. 113.</dcterms:relation><dcterms:spatial>Philippines</dcterms:spatial><dcterms:license>CC0 1.0</dcterms:license></metadata>