{"dcterms:modified":"2025-04-02","dcterms:creator":"Harvard Dataverse","@type":"ore:ResourceMap","schema:additionalType":"Dataverse OREMap Format v1.0.1","dvcore:generatedBy":{"@type":"schema:SoftwareApplication","schema:name":"Dataverse","schema:version":"6.6 build 1829-192cdc4","schema:url":"https://github.com/iqss/dataverse"},"@id":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/export?exporter=OAI_ORE&persistentId=https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS","ore:describes":{"author":{"citation:authorName":"HAZLETT, CHAD","citation:authorAffiliation":"University of California, Los Angeles","authorIdentifierScheme":"ORCID","authorIdentifier":"0000-0003-1819-1928"},"citation:datasetContact":{"citation:datasetContactName":"HAZLETT, CHAD","citation:datasetContactAffiliation":"University of California, Los Angeles","citation:datasetContactEmail":"chazlett@ucla.edu"},"citation:dsDescription":{"citation:dsDescriptionValue":"One political barrier to climate reforms is the temporal mismatch between short-term policy costs and long-term policy benefits. Will public support for climate reforms increase as climate-related disasters make the short-term costs of inaction more salient? Leveraging variation in the timing of Californian wildfires, we evaluate how exposureto a climate-related hazard influences political behavior, rather than self-reported attitudes or behavioral intentions. We show that wildfires increased support for costly, climate-related ballot measures by 5 to 6 percentage points for those living within 5km of a recent wildfire, decaying to near zero beyond a distance of 15km. This effect is concentrated in Democratic-voting areas, and nearly zero in Republican-dominated areas. We conclude that experienced climate threats can enhance willingness-to-act but largely in places where voters are known to believe in climate change.","citation:dsDescriptionDate":"2020-05-22"},"citation:keyword":{"citation:keywordValue":"climate, wildfire, environment, sensitivity analysis"},"citation:depositor":"HAZLETT, CHAD","title":"Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas","dateOfDeposit":"2020-05-23","subject":"Social Sciences","publication":{"publicationCitation":"HAZLETT, C., & MILDENBERGER, M. (2020). Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas. American Political Science Review, 1-7.","publicationIDType":"doi","publicationIDNumber":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000441","publicationURL":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000441"},"journal:journalVolumeIssue":{"journal:journalPubDate":"2020-07-15"},"alternativeURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS","journal:journalArticleType":"letter","@id":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS","@type":["ore:Aggregation","schema:Dataset"],"schema:version":"1.0","schema:name":"Replication Data for: Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas","schema:dateModified":"Thu Jul 16 12:12:49 UTC 2020","schema:datePublished":"2020-07-16","schema:creativeWorkStatus":"RELEASED","schema:license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","dvcore:fileTermsOfAccess":{"dvcore:fileRequestAccess":false},"schema:includedInDataCatalog":"Harvard Dataverse","schema:isPartOf":{"schema:name":"American Political Science Review Dataverse","@id":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/the_review","schema:description":"The <i>American Political Science Review</i> is political science's premier scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and review essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include political theory, American politics, public policy, public administration, comparative politics, and international relations. APSR has published continuously since 1906.\n<br><br>\nFor questions, please reach out to apsr@apsanet.org","schema:isPartOf":{"schema:name":"Harvard Dataverse","@id":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/harvard","schema:description":"<span><span><span><h3>Share, archive, and get credit for your data. Find and cite data across all research fields.</h3></span></span></span>"}},"ore:aggregates":[{"schema:name":"replication.zip","dvcore:restricted":false,"dvcore:directoryLabel":"upload","schema:version":1,"dvcore:datasetVersionId":195930,"@id":"doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS/4BUHHB","schema:sameAs":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/:persistentId?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS/4BUHHB","@type":"ore:AggregatedResource","schema:fileFormat":"application/zip","dvcore:filesize":148315906,"dvcore:storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:1723fea2ee9-a9f852902ae1","dvcore:rootDataFileId":-1,"dvcore:checksum":{"@type":"MD5","@value":"75c1573436ac6843af7d125220fa630c"}}],"schema:hasPart":["doi:10.7910/DVN/OVEGLS/4BUHHB"]},"@context":{"alternativeURL":"https://schema.org/distribution","author":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator","authorIdentifier":"http://purl.org/spar/datacite/AgentIdentifier","authorIdentifierScheme":"http://purl.org/spar/datacite/AgentIdentifierScheme","citation":"https://dataverse.org/schema/citation/","dateOfDeposit":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/dateSubmitted","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","dvcore":"https://dataverse.org/schema/core#","journal":"https://dataverse.harvard.edu/schema/journal#","ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","publication":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReferencedBy","publicationCitation":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/bibliographicCitation","publicationIDNumber":"http://purl.org/spar/datacite/ResourceIdentifier","publicationIDType":"http://purl.org/spar/datacite/ResourceIdentifierScheme","publicationURL":"https://schema.org/distribution","schema":"http://schema.org/","subject":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject","title":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/title"}}