10.7910/DVN/HNBKJG Kyle M. Dittmer Kyle M. Dittmer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-5978 International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT Sadie Shelton Sadie Shelton International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT Sessie Burns International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT Eva (Lini) Wollenberg Eva (Lini) Wollenberg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-2562 International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT Harvard Dataverse 2022 Agricultural Sciences Earth and Environmental Sciences climate change digital extension tools agriculture agroecology farmers social inclusion climate change mitigation performance assessment Asia Latin America and the Caribbean Multifunctional Landscapes climate change adaptation Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Alliance Data Management Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT 2022 2022-11-04 2022-11-10 2023-03-09 Qualitative Data;Survey Data;Climate Data 1027401 26949 93405 1030320 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 2.1 Custom terms specific to this dataset This document contains a review of global digital resources relevant to climate-informed agroecological transitions. The purpose of the review was to catalog relevant digital resources and assess their role in inclusive knowledge development, with special attention to farmers’ co-creation of knowledge for on-the-ground practices. To this end, we identified existing digital tools relevant to technical advisory and performance assessment and reviewed their functions (i.e., the purpose of using a tool) against indicators for exemplary features (i.e., the channels in which a user can engage with the tool) that could support socially inclusive, climate-informed agroecological transitions.<br><br> Metodology:To evaluate exemplary features of agricultural digital tools – defined here as an app, online resource (not platforms), or other software available on a digital device (e.g., phone, smartphone, computer, etc.), including those that are language, audio, and visually based – we developed 87 indicators (see Indicators Explained) relating to seven categories: (i) performance assessment, (ii) technological specifications, (iii) social inclusion and co-creation, (iv) scaling, (v) climate change adaptation, mitigation and whether the tool calculates greenhouse gas emissions, and (vi) agroecological principles Exemplariness was defined in this review as best fitting the requirements of the target users and best addressing agroecological and climate change mitigation and/or adaption outcomes. All indicators for categories i-v were developed and validated via several rounds of internal reviews and expert consultations. The 12 agroecological indicators (i.e., principles) were adopted and refined from the FAO 10 Elements of Agroecology (FAO, 2018), HLPE (HLPE, 2019) and TAPE (FAO, 2019) reports. Sixty (60) tools were selected for a full review against the 87 indicators based on their applicability to provide technical advisory and/or performance assessment on climate-informed agroecological transitions. Tools were classified as technical advisory resources if they delivered any recommendations regarding farming practices and as performance assessment resources if they included review of farm status or operations. Tools were mostly identified via Google searches, expert interviews, and platforms such as the CGIAR Evidence Clearing House and Digital Agri Hub. Each tool was reviewed by one analyst by accessing the tool, when available, or by reviewing materials online. A second analyst validated individual indicator responses when subjectivity in responses was an issue. Indicators were marked as ‘unknown’ when subjectivity in responses persisted or when information was not available. European Commission (funded), IFAD (managed by) 2000003773