{"status":"OK","data":{"id":61203,"identifier":"DVN/XMBQL6","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2007-11-28","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10512","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":991,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":62987,"datasetId":61203,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10512","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"Initial version","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","productionDate":"2007","UNF":"UNF:3:Suen5yCvzTQO0zq0nySNCg==","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","releaseTime":"2007-11-28T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2007-08-02T15:14:48Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/10512","publicationDate":"2007-11-28","citationDate":"2007-11-28","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":991,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"James H. Fowler"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"University of California, San Diego"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Sangick Jeon"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Stanford University"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"jhfowler@ucsd.edu"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"We construct the complete network of 30,288 majority opinions written by the U.S. Supreme Court and the cases they cite from 1754 to 2002 in the United States Reports. Data from this network demonstrates quantitatively the evolution of the norm of stare decisis in the 19th Century and a significant deviation from this norm by the activist Warren Court. We further describe a method for creating authority scores using the network data to identify the most important court precedents. This method yields rankings that conform closely to evaluations by legal experts, and even predicts which cases they will identify as important in the future. An analysis of these scores over time allows us to test several hypotheses about the rise and fall of precedent. We show that reversed cases tend to be much more important than other decisions, and the cases that overrule them quickly become and remain even more important as the reversed decisions decline. We also show that the Court is careful to ground overruling decisions in past precedent, and the care it exercises is increasing in the importance of the decision that is overruled. Finally, authority scores corroborate qualitative assessments of which issues and cases the Court prioritizes and how these change over time."}}]},{"typeName":"keyword","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"supreme court"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"social network"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"precedent"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"hub"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"authority"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"James H. Fowler, Sangick Jeon. 2007. \"The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent.\"\r Social Networks, doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.05.001. <a href= \"http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/authority_of_supreme_court_precedent.pdf\" target= \"_new\">article available here</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"James H. Fowler"},"distributorURL":{"typeName":"distributorURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/"},"distributorLogoURL":{"typeName":"distributorLogoURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.ucsd.edu/images/Hlogo.gif"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007-08-02"},{"typeName":"timePeriodCovered","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"timePeriodCoveredStart":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredStart","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1754"},"timePeriodCoveredEnd":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredEnd","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2002"}}]}]}},"files":[{"description":"File containing all citations","label":"Allcites.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":614750,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/QZ6YCR","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/QZ6YCR","filename":"Allcites.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":2532191,"description":"File containing all citations","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4754","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"3543d21f780f601724d16f06fe296255","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"3543d21f780f601724d16f06fe296255"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the authority score for each case in each year","label":"Authmat.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614755,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/2UYQXI","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/2UYQXI","filename":"Authmat.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":34201551,"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the authority score for each case in each year","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4755","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"ed5c22bf0bfe5a9b75975ca89f679e88","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"ed5c22bf0bfe5a9b75975ca89f679e88"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Original article for this study","label":"Authority_of_supreme_court_precedent.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":614757,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/SDVUQY","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/SDVUQY","filename":"Authority_of_supreme_court_precedent.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":1317306,"description":"Original article for this study","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4756","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"e9077a94857f57724fdc94556e9a42f6","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"e9077a94857f57724fdc94556e9a42f6"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the hub score for each case in each year. Notice that hub scores can change from year to year since the authority of cited precedents can change over time","label":"Hubmat.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614754,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/XATKGV","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/XATKGV","filename":"Hubmat.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":32931187,"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the hub score for each case in each year. Notice that hub scores can change from year to year since the authority of cited precedents can change over time","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4758","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"a428011e64f2fb33b33822484c3ad3a2","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"a428011e64f2fb33b33822484c3ad3a2"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the inward citation count for each case in each year","label":"Indegmat.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614751,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/8Q9XAS","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/8Q9XAS","filename":"Indegmat.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":16506832,"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the inward citation count for each case in each year","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4759","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"b93972cf1e6ada3b773ae0b58ed58aff","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"b93972cf1e6ada3b773ae0b58ed58aff"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Aggregate results file, including ranks of case authority and hub scores","label":"Judicial.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614758,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/0LLING","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/0LLING","filename":"Judicial.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":3034195,"description":"Aggregate results file, including ranks of case authority and hub scores","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4762","originalFileFormat":"application/x-spss-sav","originalFormatLabel":"SPSS Binary","originalFileSize":3983270,"originalFileName":"Judicial.sav","UNF":"UNF:3:Suen5yCvzTQO0zq0nySNCg==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"fbe04e83afa7c9c844bf48ca1d47367f","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"fbe04e83afa7c9c844bf48ca1d47367f"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data Files in original ascii format","label":"Judicial.zip","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614752,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/VRNI0T","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/VRNI0T","filename":"Judicial.zip","contentType":"application/zip","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":17391093,"description":"Data Files in original ascii format","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4757","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"a795224c2312831e8f5b9d22e2261841","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"a795224c2312831e8f5b9d22e2261841"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the outward citation count for each case in each year. Notice that outward citations never change once a case comes into existence","label":"Outdegmat.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":614756,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/ZQYPJB","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/ZQYPJB","filename":"Outdegmat.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":16527772,"description":"Complex matrix that identifies the outward citation count for each case in each year. Notice that outward citations never change once a case comes into existence","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4760","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"64609d71a099076f19b3a9757148133a","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"64609d71a099076f19b3a9757148133a"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Detailed information about the files in this study","label":"Readme.txt","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62987,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":614753,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/C5GBWV","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XMBQL6/C5GBWV","filename":"Readme.txt","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":2985,"description":"Detailed information about the files in this study","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4761","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"0de665be2b7ce601e0a34007962ec551","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"0de665be2b7ce601e0a34007962ec551"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-08-02","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}