{"status":"OK","data":{"id":61025,"identifier":"DVN/WSOTFO","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10327","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":997,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":62755,"datasetId":61025,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10327","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"Initial version","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","productionDate":"2005","UNF":"UNF:3:1UhSsWZtk7M5aPFABu0SDA==","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:01:12Z","releaseTime":"2009-01-21T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2007-06-25T17:48:13Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/10327","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","citationDate":"2009-01-21","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":997,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: Judging Statutes: Interpretive Regimes"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Nancy Staudt"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Washington University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Northwestern University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Peter Wiedenbeck"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Washington University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"René Lindstädt"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Washington University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Ryan J. Vander Wielen"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Washington University"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"lee-epstein@northwestern.edu"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Scholars, judges, and commentators have long puzzled over the best method to locate the meaning of a statute. The importance of this project has prompted countless theorists to devise competing modes of interpretation that rely on various forms of evidence, including statutory text, legislative intent, and agency interpretation. In this Article, co-authors Nancy Staudt, Lee Epstein, Peter Wiedenbeck, Rene Lindstadt, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen do not defend an existing interpretive regime nor do they seek to develop a new approach; rather they provide a descriptive mapping of the Supreme Court's approach for under-standing statutes in the business context over the course of the last century. The authors find that the justices privileged their own under-standing of statutory meaning in the early eras, but more recently have deferred to congressional views of the executive branch in the interpretive process. The authors also compare their findings to the Court's approach to reaching decisions in the civil rights context and find several areas of divergence. This descriptive project highlights a range of empirical questions that have yet to be answered and thus suggests new avenues for research."}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Nancy Staudt, Lee Epstein, Peter Wiedenbeck, René Lindstädt, Ryan J. Vander Wielen. 2005. \"Judging Statutes: Interpretive Regimes.\" Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38 (5): 1909-1970. <a href= \"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/research/rationales.pdf\" target= \"_new\">article available here</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"notesText","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0  Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0  Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.;"},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2005"},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"distributorURL":{"typeName":"distributorURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/"},"distributorLogoURL":{"typeName":"distributorLogoURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.law.northwestern.edu/graphics/law-seal.gif"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007-06"},{"typeName":"relatedDatasets","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["Epstein, Lee; Staudt, Nancy; Wiedenbeck, Peter. 2003. \"Judging Statutes: Thoughts on Statutory Interpretation and Notes for a Project on the Internal Revenue Code\". Journal of Law and Public Policy. 35: 305-333.\n<a href= \"http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/lepstein/faces/study/StudyPage.jsp?studyId=750\" target= \"_new\">Study available here</a>"]}]}},"files":[{"description":"Original article for this study","label":"Rationales.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62755,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":112840,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/DGUAMG","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/DGUAMG","filename":"Rationales.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":1955709,"description":"Original article for this study","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:3821","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"2b57a22febd0453c013346ade239d073","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"2b57a22febd0453c013346ade239d073"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-16","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:01:12Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data file for this study","label":"Rationales.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62755,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":113984,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/0QIAF0","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/0QIAF0","filename":"Rationales.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":139595,"description":"Data file for this study","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:3994","originalFileFormat":"application/x-stata","originalFormatLabel":"Stata Binary","originalFileSize":266753,"originalFileName":"Rationales.dta","UNF":"UNF:3:1UhSsWZtk7M5aPFABu0SDA==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"3a7ee349ab279780549ddcee190106b3","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"3a7ee349ab279780549ddcee190106b3"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-07-18","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:01:12Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Zip file containing data for this study in original format","label":"Rationales.zip","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62755,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":112841,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/IEQ2GN","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WSOTFO/IEQ2GN","filename":"Rationales.zip","contentType":"application/x-zip-compressed","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":34197,"description":"Zip file containing data for this study in original format","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:3822","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"814a532937df77957c40ee6e15450635","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"814a532937df77957c40ee6e15450635"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-16","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:01:12Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}