{"status":"OK","data":{"id":61021,"identifier":"DVN/WIBHTC","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10338","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":995,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":62751,"datasetId":61021,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10338","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"Initial version","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","productionDate":"2002","UNF":"UNF:3:ju0TNHWK8EpOfUFQCsV/rw==","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","releaseTime":"2009-01-21T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2007-06-25T18:33:28Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/10338","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","citationDate":"2009-01-21","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":995,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: Dynamic Agenda-setting on the United States Supreme Court: an Empirical Assessment"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Northwestern University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Jeffrey A. Segal"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"State University of New York at Stony Brook"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Jennifer Nicoll Victor"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Washington University"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"lee-epstein@northwestern.edu"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Because agenda setting is one of the most important activities undertaken by Supreme Court justices, it is hardly surprising to find a rather large body of literature devoted to how they go about performing this task. What is surprising is that the bulk of the agenda-setting literature views the justices in isolation, establishing their own policy priorities with little attention to the preferences and likely actions of actors in other political institutions.\n<br /><br />\r \r Based on a strategic account of agenda setting, we call for a reexamination of this position. Specifically, we argue that Supreme Court justices may be attentive to the preferences and likely actions of members of other political institutions when they go about establishing their agendas, if they hope to maximize their preferences. Because our findings support this claim, we conclude that studies of Court agenda setting, which do not take account of constraints imposed by actors\nin other institutions, may ignore the realities of the American separation of powers system."}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A. Segal, Jennifer Nicoll Victor. 2002. \"Dynamic Agenda-setting on the United States Supreme Court: an Empirical Assessment.\" Harvard Journal on Legislation 39: 395-433. <a href=\"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/research/dynamic.pdf\" target= \"_new\">article available here</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"notesText","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0  Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0  Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.;"},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2002"},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"distributorURL":{"typeName":"distributorURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/"},"distributorLogoURL":{"typeName":"distributorLogoURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.law.northwestern.edu/graphics/law-seal.gif"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"}]}},"files":[{"description":"Midwest paper","label":"Conferencepapers1997MPSA.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62751,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":112028,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/YRVJOL","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/YRVJOL","filename":"Conferencepapers1997MPSA.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":489466,"description":"Midwest paper","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:2990","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"14b4650253016d2325a0ec66f12718f3","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"14b4650253016d2325a0ec66f12718f3"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Conference Group paper","label":"Conferencepapers1997SciStudy.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62751,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":112029,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/YQTWIW","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/YQTWIW","filename":"Conferencepapers1997SciStudy.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":1659459,"description":"Conference Group paper","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:2991","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"873cc6c84601bf095749e2bab586e595","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"873cc6c84601bf095749e2bab586e595"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Article for this study","label":"Dynamic.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62751,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":112030,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/SW4NWF","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/SW4NWF","filename":"Dynamic.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":288331,"description":"Article for this study","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:2992","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"b4935fbafe8e94d7d49cb779bf319a9a","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"b4935fbafe8e94d7d49cb779bf319a9a"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data file for this study","label":"Dynamic.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62751,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":112031,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/3757A7","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/3757A7","filename":"Dynamic.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":1773,"description":"Data file for this study","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:2993","originalFileFormat":"application/x-spss-por","originalFormatLabel":"SPSS Portable","originalFileSize":2542,"originalFileName":"Dynamic.por","UNF":"UNF:3:ju0TNHWK8EpOfUFQCsV/rw==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"6c3ce9797ce026ace47eb3e3c0378b23","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"6c3ce9797ce026ace47eb3e3c0378b23"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Zip file containing data for this study in original file format","label":"Dynamic.zip","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62751,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":112032,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/UUGF8B","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WIBHTC/UUGF8B","filename":"Dynamic.zip","contentType":"application/x-zip-compressed","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":1240,"description":"Zip file containing data for this study in original file format","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:2994","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"b65b24f4910c6bac4ee738cae672b52c","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"b65b24f4910c6bac4ee738cae672b52c"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-09","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:00:28Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}