{"status":"OK","data":{"id":61020,"identifier":"DVN/W5CV8E","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10347","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":997,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":62750,"datasetId":61020,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/10347","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"Initial version","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","productionDate":"2006","UNF":"UNF:3:BMl3qxqF90ojQbhkBDfhzQ==","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:05:05Z","releaseTime":"2009-01-21T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2007-06-25T18:56:02Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/10347","publicationDate":"2009-01-21","citationDate":"2009-01-21","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":997,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Northwestern University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"René Lindstädt"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Stony Brook University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Jeffrey A. Segal"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Stony Brook University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Chad Westerland"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"University of Arizona"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"lee-epstein@northwestern.edu"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"A near-universal consensus exists that the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 triggered a new regime in the Senate's voting over presidential nominees—a regime that de-emphasizes ethics, competence, and integrity and stresses instead politics, philosophy, and ideology. Nonetheless, this conventional wisdom remains largely untested.\n<br /><br />\r \r In this article we explore the extent to which the Bork nomination has affected the decisions of U.S. Senators. To do so, we modernize, update, and backdate the standard account of confirmation politics offered by Cameron, Cover, and Segal (1990) to cover all candidates for the Supreme Court from Hugo Black in 1937 through John Roberts in 2005.<br /><br />\r \r Our results confirm conventional wisdom about the Bork nomination but with two notable caveats. First, while the importanc\ne of ideology has reached new heights, the Senate's emphasis on this factor had its genesis some three decades earlier, in the 1950s. Second, while ideology is of paramount concern to senators, a candidate's professional merit also remains a significant determinant of success in the Senate.\n<br /><br />"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt, Jeffrey A. Segal, Chad Westerland. 2006. \"The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.\" Journal of Politics 68 (2): 296-307. <a href= \"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/research/Bork.pdf\" target= \"_new\">article available here</a>"}},{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt, Jeffrey A. Segal, Chad Westerland. 2006. \"The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.\" Journal of Politics 68 (2): 296-307. <a href= \"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/research/Bork.pdf\" target= \"_new\">article available here</a>"}},{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A. Segal. 2005. “Advice and Consent: the Politics of Judicial Appointments.” New York: Oxford University Press. <a href= \"http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Politics/AmericanPolitics/LawCourts/~~/dmlldz11c2EmY2k9OTc4MDE5NTMwMDIxNQ==\" target= \"_new\">book available here</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"notesText","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0  Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0  Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.;"},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2006"},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Lee Epstein"},"distributorURL":{"typeName":"distributorURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/"},"distributorLogoURL":{"typeName":"distributorLogoURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.law.northwestern.edu/graphics/law-seal.gif"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007-06"},{"typeName":"timePeriodCovered","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"timePeriodCoveredStart":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredStart","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1937"},"timePeriodCoveredEnd":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredEnd","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2005"}}]},{"typeName":"relatedDatasets","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A. Segal, Nancy  Staudt, René Lindstädt. 2005. \"The Role of Qualifications in the Confirmation of Nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court.\" Florida State University Law Review 32 (4): 1145-1173.\n<a href= \"http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/lepstein/faces/study/StudyPage.jsp?studyId=749\" target= \"_new\">study available here</a><br /><br />\r \r Workshop on Empirical Research in the Law. 2005. \"On Tournaments for Appointing Great Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court.\" Southern California Law Review 78: 157-178. <a href= \"http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/lepstein/faces/study/StudyPage.jsp?studyId=748\" target= \"_new\">study available here</a>"]}]}},"files":[{"description":"Original article for this study","label":"Bork.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62750,"categories":["1. Documentation"],"dataFile":{"id":112866,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/YR3FGP","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/YR3FGP","filename":"Bork.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":262786,"description":"Original article for this study","categories":["1. Documentation"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:3852","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"76c16aadcb14bb30476c3510576c1947","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"76c16aadcb14bb30476c3510576c1947"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-17","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:05:05Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data file in original stata file format","label":"Bork.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62750,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":113998,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/XX4120","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/XX4120","filename":"Bork.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":297080,"description":"Data file in original stata file format","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:4013","originalFileFormat":"application/x-stata","originalFormatLabel":"Stata Binary","originalFileSize":303369,"originalFileName":"Bork.dta","UNF":"UNF:3:BMl3qxqF90ojQbhkBDfhzQ==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"ccb04b4d9396728631b01d51c9650f8e","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"ccb04b4d9396728631b01d51c9650f8e"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-07-18","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:05:05Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Zip file containing data for this study","label":"Bork.zip","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":62750,"categories":["2. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":112867,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/AJQC4D","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/W5CV8E/AJQC4D","filename":"Bork.zip","contentType":"application/zip","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":59636,"description":"Zip file containing data for this study","categories":["2. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:3853","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"b428ab1f637050fe4d062c76df6bb2ad","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"b428ab1f637050fe4d062c76df6bb2ad"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-07-17","publicationDate":"2009-01-20","lastUpdateTime":"2009-01-21T15:05:05Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}