{"status":"OK","data":{"id":64839,"identifier":"DVN/UH9W2F","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2011-02-10","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/15557","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":995,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":66736,"datasetId":64839,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/15557","versionNumber":4,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"1997","productionDate":"1997","UNF":"UNF:5:sOm+noco65w2lZwjoocmIw==","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","releaseTime":"2011-02-10T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/15557","publicationDate":"2011-02-10","citationDate":"2011-02-10","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":995,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Ohio State University"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Laura W. Arnold"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Christopher J.W. Zorn"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier"},"datasetContactAffiliation":{"typeName":"datasetContactAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Ohio State University"},"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"N/A"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"A critical element of decision making is the timing of choices political actors make; often when a decision is made is as critical as the decision itself. We posit a dynamic model of strategic position announcement based on signaling theories of legislative politics. We suggest that members who receive clear signals from constituents, interest groups, and policy leaders will announce their positions earlier. Those with conflicting signals will seek more information, delaying their announcement. We test several expectations by examining data on when members of the House of Representatives announced their positions on the North American Free Trade Agreement. We also contrast the timing model with a vote model, and find that there are meaningful differences between the factors influencing the timing of position announcements and vote choice. Our research allows analysts to interpret the process leading up to the House action and the end state of that process."},"dsDescriptionDate":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1997"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Laura W. Arnold, and Christopher J.W. Zorn. 1997. \"The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement.\" American Political Science Review, v. 91, no. 2 (June): 324-38. <a href= \"http://polisci.osu.edu/faculty/jbox/papers/strategic.pdf\"  target=\"_new\">article available here</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"producer","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"producerName":{"typeName":"producerName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier"},"producerAffiliation":{"typeName":"producerAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Ohio State University"}}]},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1997"},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier"},"distributorAffiliation":{"typeName":"distributorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Ohio State University"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1997"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2011-02-10"}]}},"files":[{"description":"Read me for details on data and code","label":"README","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":66736,"categories":["Read Me"],"dataFile":{"id":2252287,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/Z9FSPX","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/Z9FSPX","filename":"README","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":1384,"description":"Read me for details on data and code","categories":["Read Me"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:63563","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"ef1d1e108391631f63c81ba7ab2e701d","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"ef1d1e108391631f63c81ba7ab2e701d"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-02-10","publicationDate":"2011-02-09","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Text file","label":"TIMING.LOG","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":66736,"categories":["Supplementary Files"],"dataFile":{"id":2252288,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/90XVYP","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/90XVYP","filename":"TIMING.LOG","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":8546,"description":"Text file","categories":["Supplementary Files"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:63564","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"fab3e17ab14af536af9193b2a9f9976b","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"fab3e17ab14af536af9193b2a9f9976b"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-02-10","publicationDate":"2011-02-09","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"District Union Data","label":"TIMING.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":66736,"categories":["District Union Data"],"dataFile":{"id":2252286,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/91N0KE","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/91N0KE","filename":"TIMING.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":52092,"description":"District Union Data","categories":["District Union Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:63562","originalFileFormat":"application/x-stata","originalFormatLabel":"Stata Binary","originalFileSize":27030,"originalFileName":"TIMING.dta","UNF":"UNF:5:sOm+noco65w2lZwjoocmIw==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"a42d69143f06dcd0972cad0173d700d0","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"a42d69143f06dcd0972cad0173d700d0"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2011-02-10","publicationDate":"2011-02-09","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Zip file containing all original files for this study","label":"TIMING.ZIP","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":66736,"categories":["District Union Data"],"dataFile":{"id":2252289,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/NECNMX","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/NECNMX","filename":"TIMING.ZIP","contentType":"application/zip","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":39697,"description":"Zip file containing all original files for this study","categories":["District Union Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:63565","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"ae4aa3d569ef97e99185b5c5a486601d","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"ae4aa3d569ef97e99185b5c5a486601d"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-02-10","publicationDate":"2011-02-09","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Paper describing creation of dataset","label":"Union_Data1.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":66736,"categories":["Supplementary Files"],"dataFile":{"id":2252290,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/GBI0TI","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UH9W2F/GBI0TI","filename":"Union_Data1.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":9627,"description":"Paper describing creation of dataset","categories":["Supplementary Files"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:63566","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"1515174e5bb70a8ce680b9f983fe62ce","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"1515174e5bb70a8ce680b9f983fe62ce"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-02-10","publicationDate":"2011-02-09","lastUpdateTime":"2011-02-10T20:17:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}