{"status":"OK","data":{"id":53087,"identifier":"DVN/QDEEBK","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2007-11-28","storageIdentifier":"s3://10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":996,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":50738,"datasetId":53087,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"Initial version","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","productionDate":"2006","UNF":"UNF:3:1PGgPWTH61DST2AB4qg6Yg==","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","releaseTime":"2007-11-28T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2007-06-11T21:30:49Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/10201","publicationDate":"2007-11-28","citationDate":"2007-11-28","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":996,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: Political Appointees and the Competence of Federal Program Management, 2006"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"David E. Lewis"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"John B. Gilmour"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"David E. Lewis"},"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"delewis@princeton.edu"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"In this article, we use the Bush administration’s management grades to analyze whether programs administered by senior executives are better managed than those administered by political appointees requiring Senate confirmation. We explain the administration’s management grading scheme and how it can be informative for evaluating comparative management quality. We explain why senior-executive-run programs should be better managed than appointee-run programs and test our claim with data on 234 federal programs. We find that political-appointee-run programs earn systematically lower grades in most management areas. We conclude that a systematic review of the proper role of political appointees in federal program management should be considered."}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"\"Political Appointees and the Competence of Federal Program Management.\"  American Politics Research, 34(1):22-50 (2006)  <a href= \"http://ca2.csa.com/csaillumina/login.php\" target=\"_blank\">(article for this study)</a>"}}]},{"typeName":"producer","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"producerName":{"typeName":"producerName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"David E. Lewis"},"producerURL":{"typeName":"producerURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.princeton.edu/~delewis/"}}]},{"typeName":"productionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2006"},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"}]}},"files":[{"description":"Time-varying covariates data","label":"gilmourtv.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":50738,"categories":["1. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":110531,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/FI6QRF","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/FI6QRF","filename":"gilmourtv.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":41771,"description":"Time-varying covariates data","categories":["1. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:1337","originalFileFormat":"application/x-stata","originalFormatLabel":"Stata Binary","originalFileSize":38130,"originalFileName":"gilmourtv.dta","UNF":"UNF:3:QhTVV7g4W2px7syOIAm54w==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"176de24364a7c112b39f6985c839f3b6","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"176de24364a7c112b39f6985c839f3b6"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-06-11","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Stata batch file ","label":"management.do","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":50738,"categories":["1. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":110530,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/BYUFZU","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/BYUFZU","filename":"management.do","contentType":"text/plain; charset=US-ASCII","friendlyType":"Plain Text","filesize":9545,"description":"Stata batch file ","categories":["1. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:1338","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"51826d7c9118ce91cb990adaa29915ab","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"51826d7c9118ce91cb990adaa29915ab"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-06-11","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data file for this study","label":"partscores060803.tab","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":50738,"categories":["1. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":110532,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/MLPBF7","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/MLPBF7","filename":"partscores060803.tab","contentType":"text/tab-separated-values","friendlyType":"Tab-Delimited","filesize":56802,"description":"Data file for this study","categories":["1. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:1339","originalFileFormat":"application/x-stata","originalFormatLabel":"Stata Binary","originalFileSize":85958,"originalFileName":"partscores060803.dta","UNF":"UNF:3:iKoIZcZQ6U3l59+F/YK1gw==","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"68af65256a41fd4885bf1f99024e871a","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"68af65256a41fd4885bf1f99024e871a"},"tabularData":true,"creationDate":"2007-06-11","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Zip file containing data files in original format","label":"politicalappointees.zip","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":50738,"categories":["1. Data"],"dataFile":{"id":110885,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/VYFCOQ","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDEEBK/VYFCOQ","filename":"politicalappointees.zip","contentType":"application/x-zip-compressed","friendlyType":"ZIP Archive","filesize":31021,"description":"Zip file containing data files in original format","categories":["1. Data"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:1749","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"4002aced17bcde42dfc6cee824b74f66","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"4002aced17bcde42dfc6cee824b74f66"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2007-06-20","publicationDate":"2007-11-27","lastUpdateTime":"2007-11-28T05:00:00Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}