{"status":"OK","data":{"id":56490,"identifier":"DVN/E3FOGH","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.7910","separator":"/","publisher":"Harvard Dataverse","publicationDate":"2011-11-07","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/17074","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":994,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":55529,"datasetId":56490,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"s3://1902.1/17074","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":1,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionNote":"","deaccessionLink":"","distributionDate":"2007","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","releaseTime":"2011-11-07T00:00:00Z","createTime":"2011-11-07T20:44:51Z","alternativePersistentId":"hdl:1902.1/17074","publicationDate":"2011-11-07","citationDate":"2011-11-07","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":1000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":994,"license":{"name":"CC0 1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Replication data for: Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication [Immigration Court Data Crosstabulations and Regression Results]"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Jaya Ramji-Nogales"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Temple University, Beasley School of Law"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Andrew I. Schoenholtz"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Georgetown Law Center"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Philip G. Schrag"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Georgetown Law Center"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactEmail":{"typeName":"datasetContactEmail","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"N/A"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"<p>Addressing consistency in the application of the law, former Attorney General Robert Jackson told Congress in 1940: \"It is obviously repugnant to one's sense of justice that the judgment meted out . . . should depend in large part on a purely fortuitous circumstance; namely the personality of the particular judge before whom the case happens to come for disposition.\" Yet in asylum cases, which can spell the difference between life and death, the outcome apparently depends in large measure on\nwhich government official decides the claim. In many cases, the most important moment in an asylum case is the instant in which a clerk randomly assigns an application to a particular asylum officer or immigration judge.\n</p>  <p>This study analyzes databases of decisions from all four levels of the asylum adjudication process: 133,000 decisions involving nationals from eleven key countries rendered by 884 asylum officers over a seven-year period; 140,000 decisions of 225 immigration judges over a four-and-a-half-year period; 126,000 decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals over a six-year period; and 4215 decisions of the U.S. courts of appeals during 2004 and 2005. The analysis reveals amazing disparities\nin grant rates, even when different adjudicators in the same office each considered large numbers of applications from nationals of the same country. For example, in one regional asylum office, 60% of the officers decided in favor of Chinese applicants at rates that deviated by more than 50% from that region's mean grant rate for Chinese applicants, with some officers granting asylum to no Chinese nationals, while other officers granted asylum in as many as 68% of their cases. Similarly, Colomb\nian asylum applicants whose cases were adjudicated in the federal immigration court in Miami had a 5% chance of prevailing with one of that court's judges and an 88% chance of prevailing before another judge in the same building. Half of the Miami judges deviated by more than 50% from the court's mean grant rate for Colombian cases.\n</p>  <p>Using cross-tabulations based on public biographies, the paper also explores correlations between sociological characteristics of individual immigration judges and their grant rates. The cross-tabulations show that the chance of winning asylum was strongly affected not only by the random assignment of a case to a particular immigration judge, but also in very large measure by the quality of an applicant's legal representation, by the gender of the immigration judge, and by the immigrati\non judge's work experience prior to appointment.</p>  <p>In their conclusion, the authors do not recommend enforced quota systems for asylum adjudicators, but they do make recommendations for more comprehensive training, more effective and independent appellate review, and other reforms that would further professionalize the adjudication system.</p>"},"dsDescriptionDate":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"}}]},{"typeName":"keyword","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Asylum adjudication"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Immigration Judges"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Immigration Courts"}}]},{"typeName":"topicClassification","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"topicClassValue":{"typeName":"topicClassValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Political refugees--Legal status, laws, etc.--United States"},"topicClassVocab":{"typeName":"topicClassVocab","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"LCSH"},"topicClassVocabURI":{"typeName":"topicClassVocabURI","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects"}},{"topicClassValue":{"typeName":"topicClassValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Emigration and immigration law--United States"},"topicClassVocab":{"typeName":"topicClassVocab","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"LCSH"},"topicClassVocabURI":{"typeName":"topicClassVocabURI","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects"}},{"topicClassValue":{"typeName":"topicClassValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Asylum, Right of--United States"},"topicClassVocab":{"typeName":"topicClassVocab","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"LCSH"},"topicClassVocabURI":{"typeName":"topicClassVocabURI","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects"}},{"topicClassValue":{"typeName":"topicClassValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Administrative procedure--United States"},"topicClassVocab":{"typeName":"topicClassVocab","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"LCSH"},"topicClassVocabURI":{"typeName":"topicClassVocabURI","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects"}},{"topicClassValue":{"typeName":"topicClassValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Legal assistance to refugees--United States"},"topicClassVocab":{"typeName":"topicClassVocab","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"LCSH"},"topicClassVocabURI":{"typeName":"topicClassVocabURI","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"60 Stanford L. Rev. 295-412 (2007)"}}]},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Georgetown Law Center"},"distributorURL":{"typeName":"distributorURL","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"http://www.law.georgetown.edu/humanrightsinstitute/refugeeroulette.htm"}}]},{"typeName":"distributionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2007"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2011-11-07"},{"typeName":"timePeriodCovered","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"timePeriodCoveredStart":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredStart","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2000-01"},"timePeriodCoveredEnd":{"typeName":"timePeriodCoveredEnd","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2004-08"}}]},{"typeName":"kindOfData","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["derived data"]},{"typeName":"software","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"softwareName":{"typeName":"softwareName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"97-2003"},"softwareVersion":{"typeName":"softwareVersion","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"97-2003"}}]},{"typeName":"relatedMaterial","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["<a href=\"http://www.asylumlaw.org/legal_tools/index.cfm?fuseaction=showJudges2004\">Immigration Judge Decisions in Asylum Cases, January 2000 – August, 2004</a>","<a href=\"http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/judgereports/\">Biographical information about Immigration Judges Active from January 2000 – August 2004</a>"]}]},"geospatial":{"displayName":"Geospatial Metadata","name":"geospatial","fields":[{"typeName":"geographicCoverage","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"country":{"typeName":"country","multiple":false,"typeClass":"controlledVocabulary","value":"United States"}}]}]},"socialscience":{"displayName":"Social Science and Humanities Metadata","name":"socialscience","fields":[{"typeName":"universe","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["140,000 asylum case decisions of 225 immigration judges between January 2000 and August 2004. Disparities in grant rates between different immigration courts and different judges within the largest courts were examined, as were correlations between the grant rates of individual judges, biographical information about those judges, and additional information about the cases."]}]}},"files":[{"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Bivariatecrosstabs.xls. ","label":"Bivariatecrosstabs.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Bivariate crosstabs"],"dataFile":{"id":2323650,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/0W9FTO","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/0W9FTO","filename":"Bivariatecrosstabs.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":38921,"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Bivariatecrosstabs.xls. ","categories":["Bivariate crosstabs"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76229","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"89d6b468d7d3322ab91e27c500e24c9b","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"89d6b468d7d3322ab91e27c500e24c9b"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Data for case outcome correlations with whether applicant has dependents, applicant representation, gender of judge, judge's work experience, U.S. president responsible for judge appointment, judge's age, number of cases processed by court, and number of cases processed by judge. ","label":"Bivariatecrosstabs.xls","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Bivariate crosstabs"],"dataFile":{"id":2323605,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/BTTTJM","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/BTTTJM","filename":"Bivariatecrosstabs.xls","contentType":"application/vnd.ms-excel","friendlyType":"MS Excel Spreadsheet","filesize":127488,"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Data for case outcome correlations with whether applicant has dependents, applicant representation, gender of judge, judge's work experience, U.S. president responsible for judge appointment, judge's age, number of cases processed by court, and number of cases processed by judge. ","categories":["Bivariate crosstabs"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76184","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"adae403a64ae8fdfef8ba5e372d72b0b","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"adae403a64ae8fdfef8ba5e372d72b0b"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Multivariatecrosstabs.xls. ","label":"Multivariatecrosstabs.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Multivariate crosstabs "],"dataFile":{"id":2323651,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/BFSWXD","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/BFSWXD","filename":"Multivariatecrosstabs.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":20086,"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Multivariatecrosstabs.xls. ","categories":["Multivariate crosstabs "],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76230","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"87ed5975f781575bb06d91077892edea","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"87ed5975f781575bb06d91077892edea"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Data for case outcome correlations with applicant representation and gender of judge; with gender of judge and judge's work experience; and with applicant representation, gender of judge, and judge's work experience.","label":"Multivariatecrosstabs.xls","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Multivariate crosstabs "],"dataFile":{"id":2323606,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/EABTDW","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/EABTDW","filename":"Multivariatecrosstabs.xls","contentType":"application/vnd.ms-excel","friendlyType":"MS Excel Spreadsheet","filesize":49664,"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Data for case outcome correlations with applicant representation and gender of judge; with gender of judge and judge's work experience; and with applicant representation, gender of judge, and judge's work experience.","categories":["Multivariate crosstabs "],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76185","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"863cbc2745b6823ac3a8d1610dac1167","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"863cbc2745b6823ac3a8d1610dac1167"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Regressionresults.xls. ","label":"Regressionresults.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Regression results"],"dataFile":{"id":2323649,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/0Q2DAX","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/0Q2DAX","filename":"Regressionresults.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":19560,"description":"Data - PDF file derived from Regressionresults.xls. ","categories":["Regression results"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76231","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"939a900fc3e0dc21e9be8448f1c0e219","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"939a900fc3e0dc21e9be8448f1c0e219"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Includes logistic regression, logistic regression with fixed effects for courts, and hierarchical linear regression.","label":"Regressionresults.xls","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":55529,"categories":["Regression results"],"dataFile":{"id":2323607,"persistentId":"doi:10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/YBPIID","pidURL":"https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E3FOGH/YBPIID","filename":"Regressionresults.xls","contentType":"application/vnd.ms-excel","friendlyType":"MS Excel Spreadsheet","filesize":41984,"description":"Data - Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet (Original). Includes logistic regression, logistic regression with fixed effects for courts, and hierarchical linear regression.","categories":["Regression results"],"storageIdentifier":"s3://dvn-cloud:76186","rootDataFileId":-1,"md5":"3fc74a969c88b97bcf8a67008a73eff8","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"3fc74a969c88b97bcf8a67008a73eff8"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationDate":"2011-11-06","lastUpdateTime":"2011-11-07T22:09:39Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}